Photo Courtesy SPREP
Hearing from those directly impacted by climate change can help us recall what’s at stake
Copenhagen, Denmark. On Friday the 11th we were heading into a briefing for civil society by UNFCCC head Yvo de Boer, when I noticed a gaggle of cameras and a crowd of conference-goers gathering a short distance from the auditorium entrance. I slipped out of line, and as I edged closer, I realized AOSIS (Association of Small Island States, a bloc of 43 countries) was holding a press conference to lay out the group’s negotiating position.
Dessima Williams, Head AOSIS
In the wake of the uproar over Tuvalu’s proposals the previous day, here was another bold statement by island nations. The first speaker, Dessima Williams of Grenada and head of AOSIS, was quite articulate. She emphasized AOSIS are on the “very frontlines of the impacts of climate change.” Many have already suffered damage, and will be subject to greater impacts in the future.
Watching her, it really hit me: these people are fighting for their homes. With global warming and rising sea levels, whole communities might simply disappear under the waves. I had understood this conceptually, but to hear someone facing this prospect make such a calm, yet impassioned statement — when essentially everything is at stake — somehow let the story became real in a way it hadn’t been before. For them, it’s not merely an academic discussion of how many percent, from what base year, under what scenarios. It’s not a political question of “What’s acceptable to domestic audiences?” It’s a question of survival.
Key demands by AOSIS:
- Warming not above 1.5 degrees C from pre-industrial (in contrast to the the 2 degrees C that has been widely circulated by other proposals)
- This means stabilizing at 350 ppm, rather than 450 ppm, and will require much deeper cuts from developed countries.
- Significantly more funding for adaptation
- A legally-binding instrument. Though many have said only a political agreement is achievable next week, AOSIS wants the outcome to be legally binding.
In laying out their position, AOSIS asked for developed nations to shoulder their historical responsibilities and for the whole world to take appropriate action to stave off disaster. Williams noted that AOSIS countries would be doing their part: several nations will follow the example of the Maldives and pledge to go carbon neutral. Many more will implement renewable energy plans. Their message: We are doing our part. We did not even cause this problem, but we are doing right by the climate, and the rest of the countries need to follow. Otherwise, our homes, our livelihoods, our very way of life, are lost. They encouraged the throng of supporters (who carried “350 ppm” and “We support AOSIS” signs) to keep up the pressure.
Left to right: Selwin Hart of Barbados, AOSIS negotiator, Mohamed Aslam, Minister of the Environment for the Maldives, and Williams
The speakers were adamant that these were fundamental demands, but it remains unclear whether this action was meant to stake out an aggressive negotiating position to create space for a more favorable agreement, or if these are really make-it-or-break-it conditions. In any case, with 2 degrees of warming, some islands are still going under, and we’ll have populations, or even whole countries, that will be forced to migrate.
For us in the United States, a climate treaty usually calls to mind energy efficiency and renewables, cleaner technology and greener jobs—things that I wholeheartedly support and that many of us are willing to dedicate our careers to achieving. We see in a global agreement a catalyst to help renew American society and move it toward a more sustainable path.
But sometimes it’s good to hear from those who are first in the line of fire, whose lives are directly impacted by the challenges we face. It helps us to recall what’s at stake.
- posted by Kevin Hsu
M.S. Candidate, Atmosphere/Energy Program
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering
Stanford University
